The worst franchise in sports?

September 7th, 2009

Before this weekend, if you asked me how many rebuilding franchises in the NFL would trade away a first-round draft choice for a defensive lineman who has missed a quarter of the last two seasons of his careeer, turns 30 in a month, and is under contract for this season only, my answer would’ve been “none”.

Dear God did I overestimate Al Davis and the Oakland Raiders, who traded their 2011 first round draft pick to the New England Patriots for defensive lineman Richard Seymour, in what I am thoroughly convinced will turn out to be the most lopsided deal in recent memory.

Seymour is a solid player, of course.  He may very well have another three or four seasons of productivity in him.  But few talent evaluators would bet the farm on it, fewer would bet 2nd or 3rd round draft pick on it, and even fewer – to the tune of one – would bet a (likely very high) first round pick on it.

Trades in the NFL are strange animals.  They don’t happen anywhere near as frequently as in baseball, and rarely do they involve top-tier players – the previously-discussed Jay Cutler deal notwithstanding.  It’s hard to match the right player with the right system, and it is often times very difficult to determine whether or not a player’s success can be atttributed more to his own skillset and abilities, or to the system in which he plays and the talent he is surrounded by.  It’s even harder to know exactly how healthy another team’s player is, and get a truly accurate gauge as to how much more NFL life that player has in him.  As a result, NFL teams tend to build via the college draft.  It is for that reason – among others – that draft picks are the second-most prized commodity in the NFL, behind franchise quarterbacks.

And that’s where the shock sets in.  As inept as the Raiders have been run for the better part of the last ten years by a well-past-his-mental-prime  Davis, and for all the colossal personnel and public relations failures endured by that franchise, this one could well take the cake as the centerpiece miscue of the most poorly run operation in professional sports.

Not being a Raiders fan continues to pay dividends.

The RETURN of Thrill Shots!

September 1st, 2009

First, it was an AC/DC song. Then, it was a radio segment. Then, it was a blog. And now… it’s a blog again. But it’s newer, it’s improved…er, and it’s gonna be special!  Welcome to the relaunched Thrill Shots!

Jim Thome: the Gentleman Dodger

September 1st, 2009

With news this morning that the White Sox have traded Jim Thome to the Los Angeles Dodgers comes a bittersweet taste in the mouths of Sox fans everywhere.

I recall the November day, just a handful of days after the White Sox captured their first World Series championship in 88 years.  The news came through that centerfielder Aaron Rowand had been traded to the Philadelphia Phillies for slugger Jim Thome.  I was elated; incoming was a future Hall of Fame left-handed power hitter to add to an already-championship line-up and make the White Sox the odds-on favorites to win the 2006 World Series.

And they were.  For the first time possibly in the history of the publication, Sports Illustrated predicted the White Sox to win the 2006 World Series the following spring.

And what a year 2006 was.  The park was packed every night with fans still deliriously happy over the team’s triumph the year before, and the present team’s fortunes.  Thome, Jermaine Dye and Paul Konerko led an incredibly potent offense that hit more home runs than any other in baseball.  They established team records for both home runs and attendance that season, and though the pitching could not keep up, it was one hell of a year on the south side.

In Thome’s nearly four seasons with the club, he has had ups and downs, but has still put up respectable numbers and remained the most beloved person in the clubhouse until his departure.  Sox fans will never forget his 500th career home run – of the walk-off variety.  He also hit one of the most important homers in club history to win Game 163 in 2008 and send the Sox into the playoffs.

And I will never forget the 2006 World Series championship that his acquisition was supposed to insure.  It didn’t quite work out that way, but I will remember that year and his tenure with the Sox very fondly nevertheless.

As for the 2009 World Series, I’m a Dodgers fan.  The Gentleman Masher deserves one more crack at a ring, and I’m proud of Sox GM Kenny Williams for affording him that opportunity.

Josh McDaniels: the worst coach in the NFL

August 31st, 2009
That is pretty remarkable statement to make, but Denver Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels is a pretty remarkable young man.  And it’s true, he’s the worst coach in the National Football League.
As of yet, of course, we don’t know whether or not McDaniels will ever be a revered X’s and O’s strategist or decision maker; whether or not he is the wunderkind you’d expect of a man getting such a prestigious job in his early 30s, with no head coaching experience and nothing, essentially, on his resume other than serving as understudy to the vaunted football mind Bill Belichick of the New England Patriots.
What we do know is that as a direct result of McDaniels’ tactless pursuit of quarterback Matt Cassel (a show of disrespect and distrust toward incumbent and 2008 Pro Bowler Jay Cutler), McDaniels started a chain reaction (and aggravated it along the way) that led to Denver altering the course of history for two franchises by trading the superstar to the Chicago Bears for draft picks and a journeyman-type passer in Kyle Orton.
Make no mistake about it, nearly the entire reason Jay Cutler is wearing navy and orange on the Chicago lakefront is Josh McDaniels’ laughable incompetence, and will lead to not only his demise as Denver’s coach, but could easily set the Broncos’ franchise back several years.
There are certain NFL truths that cannot be escaped.  The biggest one is this: quarterback is the single most important player position in team sports, and in order to be an elite franchise and a championship contender year in and year out, a franchise must have an elite quarterback.  McDaniels failed to recognize that Cutler was exactly that.
Without coaching a single game, Josh McDaniels has sealed his legacy in Denver, and the damage he has done to their franchise will haunt them years after McDaniels is gone.

That is pretty remarkable statement to make, but Denver Broncos head coach Josh McDaniels is a pretty remarkable young man.  And it’s true, he’s the worst coach in the National Football League.

As of yet, of course, we don’t know whether or not McDaniels will ever be a revered X’s and O’s strategist or decision maker; whether or not he is the wunderkind you’d expect of a man getting such a prestigious job in his early 30s, with no head coaching experience and nothing, essentially, on his resume other than serving as understudy to the vaunted football mind Bill Belichick of the New England Patriots.

What we do know is that as a direct result of McDaniels’ tactless pursuit of quarterback Matt Cassel (a show of disrespect and distrust toward incumbent and 2008 Pro Bowler Jay Cutler), McDaniels started a chain reaction (and aggravated it along the way) that led to Denver altering the course of history for two franchises by trading the superstar to the Chicago Bears for draft picks and a journeyman-type passer in Kyle Orton.

Make no mistake about it, nearly the entire reason Jay Cutler is wearing navy and orange on the Chicago lakefront is Josh McDaniels’ laughable incompetence, and will lead to not only his demise as Denver’s coach, but could easily set the Broncos’ franchise back several years.

There are certain NFL truths that cannot be escaped.  The biggest one is this: quarterback is the single most important player position in team sports, and in order to be an elite franchise and a championship contender year in and year out, a franchise must have an elite quarterback.  McDaniels failed to recognize that Cutler was exactly that.

Without coaching a single game, Josh McDaniels has sealed his legacy in Denver, and the damage he has done to their franchise will haunt them years after McDaniels is gone.

The Great Customer Service Experiment

July 16th, 2009

I have occasional mental lapses that cause me to mis-remember dates of relative insignificance. It is because of two of these lapses that I made a late payment on my two primary credit cards this month – within one week of each other.

The similarities were staggering: I had an “Ahh, shit!” moment in each instance whereby I forgot to make the payment until the morning after the due date. Both payments were made roughly 12 hours late. Both companies listed an automatic late fee for said transactions of $39.00. And both received “Gee, shucks,” calls from me this evening in an attempt to get the respective late fees refunded.

- Call #1

The first call was to “Big Ass Bank”, with whom I’ve only recently had an account – it was opened in February. I got this card because it has a points program, and I figured if I’m going to use credit cards anyway, why not get a microscopic bit back? Representative gets on the phone. American man. I explain the situation – that I’m a doofus, and the payment slipped my mind until the morning after it was due. I was told flatly – and rather rudely – that “Big Ass Bank” does not refund any fees that are not of the bank’s error.

Well, that’s sweet of them.

Anyway, because I was getting nowhere with this attitude-laden customer service asshole, I hung up and tried my luck again. The second time around, I got an Indian man who was much gentler, but in his broken English explained their policy just as Ass #1 had. I said “Fine, give me to a supervisor, I’m closing my account.”

If haggling with credit card companies is a game of poker, “I’m closing my account” is the ultimate bluff. They have to act as though you actually are closing your account, and if there is any possible thing they can do to keep you, this is when they’ll pull such a miracle out when you were denied at every earlier point. (Hint: works well with cable companies too.)

It is at this point that I get an account specialist on the line – a woman – and explain that I’m closing my account because I’m being treated less than ideally. She begins the standard apology line, but, to my dismay, does not conclude it with an offer to remove the fee! “I’m sorry sir, but that is our policy.”

I’ve now had the policy explained to me by three different people – it’s not as though I don’t understand the concept of a policy, rather it is that I am highly skeptical of their supposed inability to break such a policy.

“Okay,” I said. “Offer me something. What can you offer me to get me to stay? I am obviously dissatisfied, and I am going to close this account unless you can do something for me.”

“Well, sir, I see that you have accumulated X number of rewards points on your account. I can help you redeem those and try and get a little bit of that money back.”

Gee, really? Does that come with a free kick to the balls? is what I want to ask, but I don’t… because at this rate, I could be charged a Kick To The Balls fee. “So you can do nothing for me? A higher limit? A lower rate? Nothing???”

“Well, sir, a limit increase would have to be approved by the credit reporting agencies (WHAT?), and you already have the lowest possible rate (no I don’t).”

In the end, my “Big Ass Bank” card has lived to fight another day due to a technicality – I am a paltry four points shy of a slightly-less-insignificant rewards plateau, and I’ll be damned if I’m going to let pride get in the way of a shopping spree!

- Call #2

Have you ever walked out of a restaurant? Have you ever had an experience so piss poor that you wouldn’t even stay and eat the trash meal they were trying to serve you? Isn’t it a relief to walk into the next restaurant, have an ordinary yet wonderful-by-comparison meal? That is what happened to me when I called the next company.

My other primary card is with the local bank that I have my checking account with, and have for a number of years. I’ve had this card account open for several years as well, and, shy of a rewards system, it has treated me better than any other card I’ve ever had (and I’ve had an extraordinary number of them).

I get on the line with a representative and explain my lapse. She is polite – even giggles when I refer to myself as a doofus for paying late – and with nary a hesitation she removes the charge.

Mission accomplished. I’m batting .500, it’s time to retire.

Mr. Wallace,” she says, just prior to the call’s conclusion, “I would also like to let you know that we would be happy to increase your credit line if you should so desire.”

Mr. Wallace likes large credit lines. Mr. Wallace is financially aroused. Mr. Wallace sees his debt-to-credit ratio shrink, his FICO score rise, and it’s as though Mr. Wallace is watching financial porn.

“Yes, that would be splendid!” I glow, as each passing second washes away bruises from the beating at the hands of “Big Ass Bank”. “I appreciate your help!”

I pressed my luck here, too. Asked for a reduced rate, but was rejected. Ah hell, you can’t have it all. But playing ball with me on the late fee and then offering a line increase out of nowhere goes a long way to me resuming my practice of using their card exclusively.

And in five more dollars, my relationship with “Big Ass Bank” will come to an abrupt end thanks to an unfortunate anti-consumer policy. I’ve had dozens of credit cards over the years, and have groveled to plenty of them to get late fees taken down. This is the first time I’ve been flat-out rejected. Should I take that kind of treatment for a pittance reward? I think not.

Loyalty pays. So does doing business with a non-ginormous national bank.

Changing the Rules: the National Football League

April 28th, 2009

This is an ongoing series in which I examine elements of the mechanics of professional sports that could use modernization or improvement

-

The National Football League has set a pretty fine example over the years on how to be a flexible enough sport to adopt changes and morph into a more modern form as time goes on. It was the first sport to adopt video replay on a wide scale, and while the system is not totally perfected, it is far and away the best in sports, and has helped the league become what I believe to be the most well-officiated major sport.

While the only changes I would make to modernize the NFL are small ones – broadening the reach of instant replay, establishing a far greater number of cameras and angles at which the official can see replays, etc. – the league is in a constant state of change when it comes to rules and policies, and you can expect major changes coming soon to the NFL.

Current changes that the league is discussing include expanding the regular season schedule to 17 or 18 games per team while reducing the preseason to 2 or 3, and modifying the overtime system to make the coin-toss less significant a determining factor in the game’s outcome.

As for the schedule expansion, I’m fairly indifferent to this change. There are solid arguments on both sides of the fence. Opponents suggest that more regular season action would cause a greater number of injuries to star players, thus diluting the quality of the entire schedule. Proponents cannot stand the current slate of four (or, in some cases, five) preseason games per team, and if those were reduced and the season expanded, everybody who currently makes money from football would make even more, and fans surely wouldn’t complain about having more games to enjoy.

The most interesting schedule expansion proposal that I’ve read has been to go to a 17-game format, with each team having eight games at home, eight at an opponent’s home (“away” games), and one neutral site game. We’ve seen the NFL take it’s show on the road to London’s Wembley Stadium for a couple of regular season games now, as well as Mexico City. Exhibitions have taken place in Asia, Europe and Mexico as well. The NFL has done a spectacular job marketing its game internationally, and it seems that there are numerous hotbeds of potential NFL fanbases to cultivate all around the globe, and adding sixteen potential internationally-located match-ups per season would only enhance that growth. In my lifetime I expect to see NFL franchises located outside of North America, and I truly hope that is the case, because it would be incredibly fascinating to see how America’s game is received and consumed in various other cultures around the globe.

As for modifications to the league’s rules on overtime, I do not like the idea at all. Complaints have arisen because of the disproportionate number of games that end on the extra period’s first possession, thus making the coin toss an overly-important element. In my opinion, the root of this problem can be traced to a number of rules changes over the past two decades that have overwhelmingly favored the advancement of offensive-oriented football. Because a high-scoring contest is considered more marketable and palatable to a wider audience, the league has instituted a number of strict penalizations on aggressive defensive football.

The fact is, football is the only sport where you can score points while on defense. If the league tampers with one of the most exciting elements of its product – sudden death overtime – it will be a tragedy. If they really want to do something to make overtime more “fair”, they should loosen up pass interference and defensive holding penalties, and let it get a little more rough and tumble in the defensive backfield. Finesse offenses won’t march right down the field nearly as often if that were to happen. And who knows, maybe those coveted “casual fans” will learn to love defensive-minded football like some of us die-hards.

Changing the Rules: Major League Baseball

April 17th, 2009

This is an ongoing series in which I examine elements of the mechanics of professional sports that could use modernization or improvement

-

For as poorly as the game of baseball has handled issues from Pete Rose to steroids to the lost World Series in 1994 to the ridiculous notion of the All-Star Game determining home field advantage in the Series, overall, the game has done a remarkable job of staying true to its history. Because so relatively few rules changes have impeded the game over the decades, statistical analysis between eras is much easier to accomplish in baseball than any other sport. And while some would decry the advent of the designated hitter, the wild card, the 162-game schedule, height restrictions on the pitching mound, outlawing the spitball, etc., most changes have had a negligible to positive impact on the game. But there are still a few more that would improve the game for me.

First – and I think we can all agree on this – strike zone variation between umpires is infuriating, and must be stopped. QuesTec’s Umpire Information System was supposed to cure this, but it hasn’t. What needs to happen now, since we have the technology available, is to utilize computers to determine if a pitch was within the strike zone or not, and whether or not a batter has swung at a pitch. A home plate umpire would still exist for the purposes of at-the-plate calls, and overruling the computers in an extraordinary situation where it is deemed necessary. But these guys are so bad at calling balls and strikes, and we have the technology to fix that problem, what’s the hold up?

Second, replay must be instituted on more than just fair-foul home run calls. With the emergence of a number of cutesy outfields in some of the newer ballparks with various quirks and kitsch, there is a greater need for video replay. Tag plays, trapped catches, and close plays at the plate all could use some video mojo as well.

Finally – and I’m bracing myself for a firestorm of venom here – it’s time that the National League adopts the designated hitter.

No, really, I mean it.

I have absolutely no idea what the appeal of the NL’s style of ball is, but I can tell you that watching pitchers attempt to hit and flail away like Special Olympians does not entertain me at all. For every Carlos Zambrano who can jack a handul of homers a year and actually appear competent at the plate, you have fifty Bartolo Colons who will pull a muscle doing something they shouldn’t be doing. Pitchers are paid a lot of money to hone their craft and eat innings for their teams. Batting shouldn’t be and isn’t a part of it.

What irritates me further about the NL style of play is that it can diminish the odds of a pitcher going deep into a game. NL starters average roughly a third of an inning less than AL starters (a disparity that would be even greater if the NL guys had to face a DH every nine hitters instead of a pitch-tard). I hate the idea of a pitcher who is absolutely tearing it up on the mound being forced to the bench so some scrub can come in and blow the game. I know a lot of NL fans call this phenomenon “strategy”, and call it the mark of a good manager to be able to make the right judgments in those situations. I call it BOREDOM to watch a pitcher try to hit. And, sorry, I’m not impressed by the double-switch. It’s not quite as perplexing a concept as some National League enthusiasts would suggest.

Audacity I Hope For: What I Want From Barack Obama’s Presidency

November 13th, 2008

I haven’t kept it a secret that I supported and voted for John McCain last week. I was genuinely despondent about McCain’s loss, because it was obvious to me that, in spite of his shameful kowtowing to the religious right, he was the responsible choice for president. Of course, I said that about McCain eight years ago, too, but dumb Republicans elected the Texas dufus – a profound mistake that will continue to haunt the GOP for years to come.

Before election season was in full swing this year, I was an Obama fan. If McCain or Giuliani (yeah, I know…) wasn’t going to win the White House, my third choice… well, my third choice was Joe Biden. But my FOURTH choice was Barack Obama. I, like everyone else, was charmed by his good looks and charisma, fascinated by the idea that we could have a president who speaks English with competence, and doesn’t embarrass us at every turn. I liked him – he is, after all, pretty likable. And he has one irrefutably redeeming quality: he’s a White Sox fan.

Then, as is the case with any campaign, the mud started a-slingin’ and both candidates, with each passing day, appeared less and less desirable. We learned that the Great and Honorable John McCain was willing to use the VP position as a cheap marketing gimmick to attract female votes – which backfired, justifiably. We learned that the Mild and Tolerant Barack Obama befriends angry militants with hate-filled racist agendas. We learned that Tough John McCain was unwilling to play hardball when it counted. We learned that the Inclusive Barack Obama has steadfastly toed his party’s line for every single vote in his abbreviated political career, never once breaking from a party that SURELY has been wrong ONCE in the last ten years.

Yeah, bipartisan is his middle name.

I mean, if it wasn’t Hussein.

Needless to say, I became disenchanted with the Charismatic One. I especially didn’t appreciate his willingness to so blatantly ignore reality by suggesting that John McCain has been a George W. Bush lackey, and that the two are politically indistinguishable. With trash like that being tossed around, having been enamored with John McCain all these years certainly made me more susceptible to an opposition to Obama.

Despite my disappointment, Barack Obama’s going to be the 44th President of the United States, and I had better get comfortable with that. While I doubt a time will come that I’ll regret casting my vote for McCain, here are a few realistic things that Obama can do in his presidency to help me get comfortable.

1: Repeal the Patriot Act. Of the seemingly endless string of bad decisions that George W. Bush made during his eight years of foolishness, arrogance and incompetence, perhaps the biggest was enacting the USA PATRIOT Act, which has essentially made it legal for the Executive Branch to surveil any American without a warrant, if they have nothing beyond a hunch that said person has “terrorist ties”. (I haven’t heard defining terms this abstract since Miss Teen South Carolina’s dissertation on the impact of credit derivatives on the world’s financial markets. In retrospect, you have to wonder if she went on to become a White House economic advisor.) If Obama is the smart, freedom-loving patriot his supporters say he is, reversing the Patriot Act should be an obvious move for him.

2: Legalize gay marriage nationwide. I can’t believe we’re still stuck on this issue. Worse yet, I can’t believe the allegedly “progressive” state of California overturned their earlier decision and screwed over (pardon the pun) the gays again! Look, I know we have a boatload of religious nutcases in this country. But who allowed them to become foremost authority on marriage? And just because their Imaginary Guy hates gay people, does that mean we should legislate based on that? If Casper the Friendly Ghost told the KKK to ratchet up the lynching again, would Congress pass a bill??? Seriously, if Obama fixes this problem, I will consider voting for him in four years, instead of blowing my vote on whatever token Libertarian is on the ballot.

3: Legalize marijuana and, if he’s feeling saucy, other narcotics. While there is absolutely no logical reason whatsoever that gay marriage is outlawed, there is a little more gray area here. The theory, of course, is that if narcotics are legalized, people would become hooked more easily… which is insane. We’re allowed to kill ourselves with cheeseburgers and bourbon but not cheech and blow? This one’s going to be more challenging than the gay marriage thing. After all, there isn’t an entire law enforcement agency being employed by a War on Fags… at least, not that I’m aware of. And, let’s face reality, if a black guy pushes hard to legalize drugs, more than a few eyebrows will be raised. If he pulls this one off, I’ll not only vote for him next time, I’ll do a line in his honor on Inauguration Day, 2013. Because, you know, it’ll be legal.

4: Make the rest of the world think we’re not a nation full of Hank Hill’s. The advantage of finally having a suave, attractive, intellectually-appealing president is that the French might actually start liking us again. And that’s important, because what would we be without France? Aside from their assistance about 230 years ago – which we paid back tenfold on the beaches of Normandy – France gives us so much. Wine, cheese, hairy women… (wait! Don’t we have Napa, Wisconsin, and Italy for those things? Okay, enough France-bashing. My fists now smell like body odor.) Anyway, if Obama does make us look better and more well liked worldwide – and how could he not? – you have to acknowledge that as a positive step. Hopefully that goodwill doesn’t, as neo-cons believe, lead to disrespect by terrorist entities. I have a sneaking suspicion that, since neo-cons are wrong about everything else, they’ll probably be wrong about that too.

5: Catch Osama. The capture and execution of America’s most wanted terrorist early in an Obama term would establish two things: the first is that Tard-Nation would no longer be able to claim that Obama’s a terrorist. (Oh, they’d still try – “Look how fast that happened! Because it’s his cousin! I knew it!”) The second thing that a bin Laden capture would establish is that Obama is not the nancy-boy liberal softie that he appears to be. Nab the bad guy, put a garbage can on his head, and you’re no longer in the lace-curtained dog house. It’d be bigger than Reagan’s hostage crisis success.

If Barack Obama accomplishes even half of the things his campaign purported he would if elected, including a functional universal health care system, balancing the budget, getting to work on the deficit, responsibly getting us out of Iraq in short order, etc., all without boosting taxes on most Americans (and on the businesses that employ most Americans – small ones), I’ll stop dismissing him out-of-hand as a fiscal socialist.

How the Cubs helped put the White Sox in 1st place

August 21st, 2008

Over this past winter, there were numerous big-ticket transactions in Major League Baseball. Superstar players like Torii Hunter, Miguel Cabrera, Johan Santana, and Andruw Jones all changed addresses and cashed enormous paychecks during that period.

Never to be upstaged, Chicago Cubs general manager Jim Hendry and Chicago White Sox GM Ken Williams were both active as well. Both men had similar tasks to accomplish: shoring up unstable outfield situations.

The Cubs, coming off an impressive season that ended in a disappointingly abbreviated playoff run, had needs in center and right field. The Sox, following a miserable 2007 that featured migraine-inducing production from injury-plagued Scott Podsednik and Darin Erstad along with a black hole of minor leaguers filling in their left and center field positions, needed to make a big move.

The Sox failed to land highly touted free agent centerfielders Torii Hunter and Aaron Rowand, and they – brilliantly, as it turned out – avoided Jones like the plague. But Williams wasn’t concerned, because he – like Hendry – was in hot pursuit of a sure thing: Japanese superstar Kosuke Fukudome.

Fukudome was pursued by a handful of big-money teams including both Chicago clubs and, in the end, chose the Cubs for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, he reportedly wanted to play right field (the White Sox only had center available, with Jermaine Dye occupying right). He also had a desire to be the first Japanese player to play for whichever franchise he signed with. The Sox had already won a World Series with steady play from Tadahito Iguchi and minor contributions from Shingo Takatsu. Ironically – and thankfully, if you’re a Sox fan – Kosuke did not make the decision based on money; the Sox offered him more than the Cubs did, yet he passed.

Little did anyone (save for Ken Williams) know that Fukudome’s slight of the south siders in favor of Wrigleyville would lead Williams to two of the best acquisitions of his career.

With Rowand landing in San Francisco, Hunter in Anaheim and Fukudome nine miles north, Ken Williams went to Plan B. The biggest (perceived) move he made was acquiring Nick Swisher from Oakland. But his real coups were the signing of unknown Cuban prospect (now a Rookie of the Year candidate) Alexei Ramirez, and trading a Single-A player for current MLB home run leader (and MVP frontrunner) Carlos Quentin, neither of whom were a lock to make the big league roster, let alone start and eventually star on it.

These were not considered coups at the time, of course. Any team in baseball could’ve had Quentin or Ramirez for a rather low price. The difference is that while every MLB team thought Fukudome was a virtual lock to be a star, few considered Quentin viable, and even fewer knew who Ramirez was. They know now, however.

Quentin leads baseball in home runs, is in the top five in runs batted in, and is hitting nearly .300 while being on base almost 40 percent of the time. Not bad for a guy who seemingly went from first-round draft pick to injury-plagued bust with the Diamondbacks.

Ramirez, after spending most of the first month and a half of this season on the bench, took over as the starting second baseman in May and hasn’t come close to relinquishing the job. Aside from his eye-popping offensive output – a .309 average with 14 home runs and 55 RBI in only 350 at bats – Ramirez has played a spectacular defensive second base, making a number of highlight-reel plays displaying outstanding range, sure hands and a rocket of an arm. Not bad for a guy who never stepped foot on an American baseball diamond before spring training.

For his part, Fukudome’s Cubs career started off dramatically – with a 3-run homer to win on Opening Day. And with a .305 average in April and .293 in May, Kosuke’s star rose, and he was named to the All-Star team. However, he began to slide, with a .264 average in June, .236 in July, and an abysmal .164 in August, and has lost his everyday starting job.

Seems Williams owes Fukudome and Hendry a debt of gratitude. If things had worked out differently, Kenny may not have looked like the genius he currently does. And the White Sox wouldn’t be in first place, leading baseball in home runs by a wide margin.

Speakerphone On, Manners Off

April 9th, 2008

The time has come for me, knower of things, to dictate to the masses – who know less things – about the proper use of speakerphones.

I will preface this by acknowledging how convenient speakerphones are, and that there are specific circumstances under which they’re particularly useful.

HOWEVER!

Unless we’re speaking of a person who lacks arms, no person has ANY REASON WHATSOEVER to use speakerphone to place a phone call to another human being. Period.

Oh, I’m sorry, you feel the need to argue? Fuck you! You’re wrong, ignorant, and full of odor! I’ll dispel your arguments right here!

“Oh but Ryan! I’m driving, and it’s illegal to put the phone to your face in my state!” Tough shit, get your ass off the road before you dial. You have no business making calls while driving – my safety is at risk! If you absolutely CANNOT wait until you arrive at your destination to gab about god-knows-what, get a Bluetooth headset.

“Oh but Ryan! I am trying to (insert other activity here) while on the call!” You self-important assbag! Stop surfing the web. Stop instant messaging. Put down the sandwich. Get your hand off your cock. You may think your time is more valuable than mine, but you’re just kidding yourself. If you’re on a call, ACT LIKE YOU’RE ON A CALL. Give the caller the attention and respect he or she deserves; don’t big shot it… cause you are not a big shot. Sorry.

“Oh but Ryan! I’m deaf, and the normal setting on my cell phone is not loud enough!” TOUGH SHIT, DEAFBAG! Guess what? Time for a hearing aid! And if you don’t like the way that idea sounds, it’s okay – you won’t be able to hear it anyway, dunce. You’re clearly too God damn, incompetent, or otherwise imbecilic to use a phone. So close your eyes and drift silently into the great beyond!

“Oh but Ryan! I’m in a room by myself, interrupting nobody else, and I’m dialing an automated line on which I will not speak to (and therefore disrespect) another human being.” Permission granted. “Oh but Ryan! I just had to stroll into the other room with all those people in it–” HANG UP, YOU PRICK!

In summation, using your speakerphone in a one-on-one conversation is among the more ignorant-ass things you can do to another person. It is a symbol of your lack of respect for the person on the other end, and any person within earshot of your conversation. Phone calls are treated far too casually in modern society. Part of me longs for the days when a phone call was an event; when one was on a call, he or she devoted all of his or her attention to that call. Impractical though that may be, it was a much more respectful practice that has gone the way of the nuclear family, leather football helmets, and non-publicized presidential fellatio (*cough* JFK). I suppose this dream of mine is a pipedream – I mean, if we can’t let a president get blown without terrorizing his family about it for a decade-plus, how the hell can we expect Joe Tool to tone down his obnoxious cellular habits?